Agentic AI & MCP security
Review the permissions, tools, memory, and approval paths of AI agents that can act inside your business.
Give agents boundaries that hold.
Specialist delivery and availability are confirmed during scoping.
THE RIGHT STARTING POINT
For teams using agents for support, engineering, research, or operational workflows. Live destructive actions are excluded unless explicitly authorized in an isolated test arrangement.
A clear scope. A useful outcome.
Map what an agent can read, remember, delegate, and change. Examine the trust boundaries between users, models, tools, and other agents, including Model Context Protocol (MCP) integrations where present. Use approved workflows to check whether untrusted content can redirect an action or bypass a decision owner. Define a recovery path for an incorrect or interrupted action before expanding automation.
The final scope, deliverables, and timing are agreed for your engagement.
What we cover
- Agent and tool identity, delegated permissions, and secrets
- MCP server trust, tool descriptions, and integration boundaries
- Memory isolation, cross-agent communication, and untrusted instructions
- Human approval, action limits, audit trails, and safe termination
What you take away
- Agent capability and trust-boundary inventory
- Workflow abuse findings with controlled reproduction evidence
- Permission, approval, and containment recommendations
- Operational test cases for release and integration changes
How to engage
Architecture workshop and scoped workflow assessment, with implementation support by agreement.
What progress looks like
Sensitive actions covered by enforceable authorization, auditable approvals, and exercised stop conditions.
Before the engagement.
Agree the systems and business processes in scope, the authorisation required, the people involved and how the findings will be used. Timelines, deliverables, exclusions and any verification work should be confirmed directly.
Prepare an enquiry about this service ↗Source-linked service brief, migrated for this local redesign. Public descriptions are not a statement of work; service capacity and wording require owner review.
View the current Secureline service page ↗A connected perspective.
AI risk & governance
Set ownership, risk decisions, and assurance requirements for the AI your business builds, buys, and uses.
AI application pentesting
Assess how prompts, retrieval, identity, and integrations interact in your customer-facing AI or internal copilot.
AI model pentesting
Evaluate security risks in model behaviour, data exposure, and robustness using tests matched to the access you can authorize.