Secureline / Research

Keep asking
better questions.

A small, considered reading desk for the decisions behind security work.

Source-linked notes. Original outlines.
Publication status, always in view.

The research desk

Find a useful
next question.

Reading notes and work in progress. The status stays attached to the work.

Showing 16 items

Published source ≠ a new local publication.
Draft article ≠ approved publication.
External report ≠ Secureline research.

Blog / Reading note

Why Annual VAPT Is Not Enough in 2026

A short reading note on testing cadence, with the original article and its publication date kept in view.

  • VAPT
  • Testing cadence
  • Reading note

Published source ·

Open the reading note

Blog / Classic vs new

Hashes Don't Survive Contact: Signature AV and Static IOCs vs. EDR and Behavioural Detection

Matching artefacts the attacker controls loses to living-off-the-land tradecraft and in-memory implants, but behavioural detection has its own blind spots, starting with appliances that cannot run an agent.

  • edr
  • detection-engineering
  • living-off-the-land
  • brickstorm

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Blog / Classic vs new

Why a WAF cannot see Broken Object Level Authorization

The WAF-plus-Web-Top-10 model inspects requests for malicious shapes; the OWASP API Security Top 10 is dominated by requests that are perfectly well-formed and simply not yours to make.

  • API Security
  • OWASP
  • BOLA
  • WAF
  • Authorization

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Blog / Classic vs new

From end-of-pipeline scanning to supply-chain controls: what xz and Shai-Hulud changed

Scanning the release candidate assumes the artifact is the one you reviewed and the dependencies are inert; two real incidents show why SBOMs, provenance and a hardened toolchain have to sit earlier in the flow.

  • Supply Chain
  • DevSecOps
  • SBOM
  • SLSA
  • NIST SSDF
  • xz-utils
  • npm

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Blog / Classic vs new

Application pentesting vs LLM red teaming: when the input is the exploit and the model is the confused deputy

LLM applications put instructions and data in the same channel, so the classic test plan still applies downstream of the model but cannot be the whole engagement.

  • LLM security
  • red teaming
  • prompt injection
  • OWASP LLM Top 10
  • MITRE ATLAS

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Blog / Classic vs new

Backup-and-Restore Is Not a Recovery Plan Anymore: Designing Against Recovery Denial

Mandiant's M-Trends 2026 describes ransomware operators attacking identity, hypervisors and backup tooling before they encrypt anything, which breaks the assumptions classic disaster recovery was built on.

  • ransomware
  • disaster-recovery
  • backup
  • active-directory
  • virtualization
  • resilience

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Blog / Classic vs new

After the Login: Standing Privilege, Stolen Tokens and Identity-First Security

MFA at the front door says little about a session token in an attacker's hands or an OAuth integration that never prompts anyone; here is how just-in-time access, consent control and identity threat detection change that.

  • identity
  • oauth
  • saas-security
  • just-in-time-access
  • zero-trust
  • itdr

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Blog / Classic vs new

From Audit Season to Evidence Pipelines: Continuous Control Monitoring Done Honestly

NIST SP 800-137, the AICPA's treatment of tool-produced evidence, and OSCAL describe a shift from assembling proof once a year to producing it continuously, and also where that shift can fail.

  • grc-engineering
  • continuous-monitoring
  • soc-2
  • oscal
  • nist-800-137
  • evidence

Draft for owner review · Not published ·

Read the article

Whitepaper / Proposed outline

From findings to decisions

An unpublished working outline for connecting a finding to context, ownership, a decision and evidence of closure.

  • Vulnerability management
  • Decision-making
  • Draft outline

Draft outline · Unpublished

Explore the outline

Whitepaper / External report

Microsoft Digital Defense Report 2026

Microsoft's annual threat report, published 1 October 2026: AI compressing attack timelines, identity as the control plane, and a shift from patching to exposure management. Summarised here with a link to the original.

  • Threat landscape
  • AI security
  • Identity
  • Annual report

External report by Microsoft ·

Read the summary

Whitepaper / External report

ENISA Threat Landscape 2026

The EU cybersecurity agency's annual assessment of 2025, published 22 September 2026: dependencies, supply chains and cloud as the amplifiers of large-scale incidents. Summarised here with a link to the original.

  • Threat landscape
  • EU
  • Ransomware
  • Annual report

External report by ENISA ·

Read the summary

Beyond this desk / Primary sources

Read at
the source.

External reading, not Secureline publications or a live intelligence feed. These links do not describe your environment.

  1. Google Threat Intelligence Group / Year in reviewLook What You Made Us Patch: 2025 Zero-Days in Review
  2. Google Threat Intelligence Group / Technical analysisDiverse Threat Actors Exploiting Critical WinRAR Vulnerability CVE-2025-8088